Was Jane Queen for 9 or 13 days?


Christine Hartweg (author of ‘John Dudley: The Life of Lady Jane Grey’s Father-In-Law ’)

(c) Christine Hartweg

I do believe that Jane Grey was queen from the day her predecessor died, 6 July 1553. It is true his death was kept secret for three or four days, but the same happened after Henry VII and Henry VIII died. So, yes, a 13-days-queen.




Richard Heath (author of ‘Killing Monarchs: Regicide in the Tudor and Stuart Age’)

(c) Pen and Sword Books Ltd

I referred to Jane as the ‘Nine Days Queen’ in my book ‘Killing Monarchs’. Although Edward VI died on 6th July, Jane was not proclaimed queen until 10th July. Usually, the next monarch’s reign starts on the death of the previous monarch, but as Jane was not the obvious or widely recognised successor then the date of the proclamation seems the right choice to mark the beginning of her reign. On 18th July the Privy Council decided that they now supported Mary’s claim to the throne. So including both the 10th and the 18th, Jane was queen for nine days.



Posted in 25 years of Lady Jane Grey Reference Guide | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Was Jane Queen for 9 or 13 days?

Was Jane Queen for 9 or 13 days?


Elizabeth Fremantle (author of ‘Sisters of Treason)

In England a monarch reigns from the death of their predecessor, which means that Jane was Queen for thirteen days. The crowning of a monarch is symbolic.




Helene Harrison (author of ‘Tudor Executions: Nobility to the Block)

(c) Pen and Sword

13 days. Just because she wasn’t aware of it for the first 4 days doesn’t mean it didn’t exist. It took a couple of days for the news to reach Ludlow Castle when Edward IV died but it didn’t mean that Edward V wasn’t king! Just as I’m sure Mary I measured her reign from the moment Edward VI died.


Posted in 25 years of Lady Jane Grey Reference Guide | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Was Jane Queen for 9 or 13 days?

Was Jane Queen for 9 or 13 days?


Stephan Edwards (author of Portraits of Lady Jane Grey Dudley, England’s ‘Nine Days Queen’)

Nine, or Ten, or Thirteen Days Queen?

The facts:

King Edward VI died on Thursday, 6 July 1553 at about 8 o’clock in the evening.

Jane Grey Dudley was officially informed by the Privy Council on Sunday, 9 July 1553 of her accession as queen.

The traditional public announcement of the death of the previous monarch (King Edward VI) and the proclamation of accession of the new monarch (Jane Grey Dudley) was made on Monday, 10 July 1553.

The Privy Council subsequently changed allegiance and publicly proclaimed Mary Tudor as queen on 19 July 1553.

But how do we properly interpret those facts? Did Jane’s reign begin when Edward drew his last breath on 6 July? Or did it instead begin when the Privy Council informed her on 9 July that she was the new queen? Or did it begin at the time of the public reading of the proclamation of her accession on 10 July? If the first, Jane’s reign lasted thirteen days. If the second, it lasted ten days. Only in the last instance might we say that her reign lasted nine days. Which is correct?

A look at other transitions from one monarch to the next is instructive.

Henry VII is usually said to have died on 22 April 1509, though some sources give the date as 21 April. The news of the king’s death was concealed for about 24 hours until his son and heir, Henry VIII, could be informed on 23 April. The new king’s accession was publicly proclaimed on that same day, 23 April 1509. Most secondary sources give 22 April 1509 as the first day of the reign of Henry VIII, however, corresponding with the date of his predecessor’s death rather than with the date on which the successor heard the news or on which the proclamation of the new accession was read publicly.

Henry VIII, in turn, died at Whitehall Palace in Westminster on 28 January 1547. The Privy Council initially withheld the news from the public, in large part because Henry’s nine-year-old son and heir, Prince Edward, was then thirty miles away in Hertford. Edward states in his own Chronicle that he learned of his father’s death on 30 January 1509, or the second day following Henry VIII’s death. The Privy Council publicly announced on 31 January that Henry VIII was dead and that Edward VI was the new king. All sources cite 28 January 1547 as the first day of Edward’s reign, however, again corresponding with the date on which the previous monarch died rather than with the date on which the successor learned the news or on which the proclamation of the new accession was read publicly.

Determination of the date of the accession Queen Mary Tudor is predicated on whether or not Jane Grey Dudley should be counted among the monarchs of England. No consensus has ever been reached on that issue, however, with even the authoritative Sweet & Maxwell’s Guide to Law Reports and Statutes conceding in relation to defining the regnal years of English monarchs that either may be counted as the immediate successor to Edward VI. But the Guide does nonetheless stipulate in either case that the new reign began on 6 July 1553, the date of Edward’s death. Mary received confirmation of her brother’s death no later than 8 July, but she was not proclaimed queen until 19 July. Thus, once again, the date on which the previous monarch died is determinative.

Queen Mary Tudor died at St James’s Palace in Westminster at about 6AM on 17 November 1558. Her successor, Elizabeth Tudor, was still under house arrest at Hatfield House in Hertfordshire, but most sources indicate that she learned of her sister’s death later that same day. The Privy Council proclaimed Elizabeth’s accession in unusually speedy fashion on that same day, 17 November 1558, as well. The date given as the first day of Elizabeth’s reign thus corresponds with the date of her predecessor’s death, with the date on which she learned she had become queen, and also with the date of her public proclamation of accession.

Lastly, Elizabeth I died on 24 March 1603 between 2 o’clock and 3 o’clock in the morning. The Privy Council publicly proclaimed the accession of King James VI of Scotland as her successor on the same day. James was then in Edinburgh, but the Privy Council had already sent him a draft of the proclamation of his accession in England prior to Elizabeth’s death, providing James with advance notice that he would soon succeed Elizabeth. James learned of Elizabeth’s actual death and his accession through non-official sources on 26 March 1603. But his reign is customarily said to have begun on 24 March 1603, the day of his predecessor’s death, even though he did not become aware until two days later that he had succeeded to the English crown.

In short, the modern convention correlates the ‘start date’ of the reign of a new monarch with the date of the death of their predecessor, even if the new monarch does not become aware of his or her accession until one or more days later and even if the public announcement of a change of reign likewise does not occur until days later.

So why is the reign of Queen Jane customarily said to have begun on 10 July 1553, the day of the public proclamation of her accession? That is four days after her predecessor’s death and one day after she officially learned of it herself. The answer lies in a grave misreading of the evidence from 6-10 July 1553 as well as in a later desire to propagandize the accession of Queen Jane by casting the event as the treasonous goal and outcome of a nefarious coup attempt staged at the sole instigation of John Dudley, Edward’s chief minister in 1553.

As with so very many ‘facts’ related to Jane Grey Dudley, we must set aside what we think we know and return instead to what the primary sources tell us. Edward died on Thursday, 6 July 1553, and the government immediately began operating under the authority of Queen Jane. As was the case with the accessions of Henry VIII, Edward VI, and James VI & I, the date on which the new monarch learned of their accession is irrelevant, and the date of the public proclamation of the new monarch is equally irrelevant.

The reign of Queen Jane began at about 8 o’clock on the evening of Thursday, 6 July 1553, and it ended on Sunday, 19 July 1553.

Jane Grey Dudley was a Thirteen-Days Queen, not a Nine-Days Queen.


Posted in 25 years of Lady Jane Grey Reference Guide | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Was Jane Queen for 9 or 13 days?

Was Jane Queen for 9 or 13 days?


Sharon Bennett Connolly (author of Heroines of the Tudor World)

(c) Amberley Publishing

Technically, I suppose, she was queen for 9 days as she was proclaimed queen 4 days after the death of Edward VI. However… ever since the 13th century, it has been the tradition in England that a monarch succeeds at the moment of the previous monarch’s death. This was established in the reign of Henry III to assure the smooth succession of Edward I, who left for crusade knowing his father was ill and not expected to live for too many more years. This is where the practice pf proclaiming ‘the king is dead, long live the king’ originates. In which case, as Edward VI had said that Jane would succeed him on his death, so she was queen the moment Edward died – proclamation or no – so, 13 days




Heather Darsie (author of Anna, Duchess of Cleves: The King’s Beloved Sister)

(c) Amberley Publishing

Lady Jane Grey was queen of England for 13 days. However, she was never anointed, which leaves open a technical dispute. Had Jane lived long enough for her coronation, she would have been properly anointed and the first true queen regnant of England.


Posted in 25 years of Lady Jane Grey Reference Guide | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Was Jane Queen for 9 or 13 days?